Some of the most successful people I know don’t have an e-mail account. I don’t mean that they don’t have a public e-mail account-I mean they don’t have one at all.
The same people don’t have a Blackberry or an iPhone either.
And, not surprisingly, they’re not on Facebook or Twitter.
Whenever I share these facts with colleagues or friends, I normally get a shocked reaction. The underlying attitude seems to be: you can’t be successful without those things. You’ll be out of touch!
I wonder. Perhaps being “out of touch” also means being in touch… with your own creativity, ideas, and internal leadership. Perhaps being “out of touch” means not being told what to think by the “million bright ambassadors” of self-induced ADHD.
I’m just sayin’.
What do you think? Is it possible to succeed today without being Uber-connected? Is being “out of touch” (in the way I have described here) a virtue? Or is it a sign that you are a complete and hopeless Luddite?




Ain't it the truth! Ain't it the truth!
Have you ever noticed how many connections guys like Gary Bencivenga or Clayton Makepeace have on LinkedIn? Twenty and 68, respectively. Pretty illustrative, wouldn't you say?
I think that 98% of the people are becoming hyper-social in order to reach their desired level of success. Many people get uber-connected indiscriminately, trying everything they can in order to grab hold of their dreams.
The upper echelons in any industry don't have that need.
What's the REAL ROI for such efforts, anyway. About 98% (my favorite number today) of the business people I know don't make big money or meet major clients through social networking.
For what it's worth, I don't have an account on Facebook or Twitter.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like